DEPO-SUBQ PROVERA 104™ (medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable suspension) 104 mg/0.65
mL Warnings
1. Loss of Bone Mineral Density
Use of depo-subQ provera 104™ reduces serum estrogen levels
and is associated with significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD) as bone metabolism
accommodates to a lower estrogen level. This loss of BMD is of particular concern
during adolescence and early adulthood, a critical period of bone accretion. It
is unknown if use of depo-subQ provera 104™ by younger
women will reduce peak bone mass and increase the risk for osteoporotic fracture
in later life. In both adults and adolescents, the decrease in BMD appears to be
at least partially reversible after depo-subQ provera 104 is discontinued and ovarian
estrogen production increases. A study to assess the reversibility of loss of BMD
in adolescents is ongoing.
depo-subQ provera 104™ should be used long-term (e.g.,
longer than 2 years) only if other methods of birth control are inadequate. BMD
should be evaluated when a woman needs to use depo-subQ provera 104 long-term. In
adolescents, interpretation of BMD results should take into account patient age
and skeletal maturity.
Other treatments should be considered in the risk/benefit analysis for the use of
depo-subQ provera 104™ in women with osteoporosis risk
factors. depo-subQ provera 104 can pose an additional risk in patients with risk
factors for osteoporosis (e.g., metabolic bone disease, chronic alcohol and/or tobacco
use, anorexia nervosa, strong family history of osteoporosis or chronic use of drugs
that can reduce bone mass such as anticonvulsants or corticosteroids).
Although there are no studies addressing whether calcium and Vitamin D lessen BMD
loss in women using depo-subQ provera 104™, all patients
should have adequate calcium and Vitamin D intake.
BMD Changes in Adult Women after Long-TermTreatment for Contraception
A study comparing changes in BMD in women using depo-subQ provera 104 with women
using Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection (Depo-Provera CI, 150 mg) showed no significant
differences in BMD loss between the two groups after two years of treatment. Mean
percent changes in BMD in the depo-subQ provera 104 group are listed in Table 3.
Table 3. Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD in Women Using depo-subQ provera
104
In another controlled clinical study, adult women using Depo-Provera CI (150 mg)
for up to 5 years showed spine and hip BMD mean decreases of 5-6%, compared to no
significant change in BMD in the control group. The decline in BMD was more pronounced
during the first two years of use, with smaller declines in subsequent years. Mean
changes in lumbar spine BMD of -2.86%, -4.11%, -4.89%, -4.93% and -5.38% after 1,
2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively, were observed. Mean decreases in BMD of the total
hip and femoral neck were similar.
After stopping use of Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) there was partial recovery of BMD
toward baseline values during the 2-year post-therapy period. Longer duration of
treatment was associated with less complete recovery during this 2-year period following
the last injection. Table 4 shows the extent of recovery of BMD for women who completed
5 years of treatment.
Table 4. Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD in Women Using Depo-Provera CI
(150 mg) or in Control Subjects
BMD Changes in Adolescent Females (12-18 years) after Long-Term Treatment for
Contraception
Preliminary results from an ongoing, open-label, self-selected, non-randomized clinical
study of adolescent females (12-18 years) also showed that Depo-Provera CI (150
mg) use was associated with a significant decline in BMD from baseline (Table 5).
In general, adolescents increase bone density during the period of growth following
menarche, as seen in the untreated cohort. However, the two cohorts were not matched
at baseline for age, gynecologic age, race, BMD and other factors that influence
the rate of acquisition of bone mineral density, with the result that they differed
with respect to these demographic factors.
Preliminary data from the small number of adolescents participating in the 2-year
post-use observation period demonstrated partial recovery of BMD.
Table 5. Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD in Adolescents Using Depo-Provera
CI (150 mg) and in Unmatched, Untreated Control Cohort Studies
BMD Changes in Adult Women after Six Months of Treatment for Endometriosis
In two clinical studies of 573 adult women with endometriosis, the BMD effects of
6 months of depo-subQ provera 104™ treatment were compared
to 6 months of leuprolide treatment. Subjects were then observed, off therapy, for
an additional 12 months (Table 6).
Table 6. Mean Percent Change from Baseline in BMD after 6 Months on Therapy with
depo-subQ provera 104 or Leuprolide and 6 and 12 Months after Stopping Therapy (Studies
268 and 270 Combined)
2. Bleeding Irregularities
Most women using depo-subQ provera 104™ experienced changes
in menstrual bleeding patterns, such as amenorrhea, irregular spotting or bleeding,
prolonged spotting or bleeding, and heavy bleeding. As women continued using depo-subQ
provera 104™, fewer experienced irregular bleeding and
more experienced amenorrhea. If abnormal bleeding is persistent or severe, appropriate
investigation and treatment should be instituted.
In three contraception trials, 39.0% of women experienced amenorrhea during month
six, and 56.5% experienced amenorrhea during month 12. The changes in menstrual
bleeding patterns from the three contraception trials are presented in Figures 3
and 4.
Figure 3. Percentages of depo-subQ provera 104 Treated Women with Amenorrhea per
30-Day Month in Contraception Studies (ITT Population, N=2053)
Figure 4. Mean (25th, 75th Percentiles)
Number of Bleeding and/or Spotting Days in the Subgroup of Women with Bleeding and/or
Spotting by Month for Women Treated with depo-subQ provera 104 in Contraception
Studies
The changes in menstrual patterns in the two endometriosis trials are presented
in Figures 5 and 6.
Figure 5. Percentages of depo-subQ provera 104 Treated Women with Amenorrhea per
30-Day Month in Endometriosis Studies (Combined ITT Population, N=289)
Figure 6. Mean (25th, 75th Percentiles)
Number of Bleeding and/or Spotting Days in the Subgroup of Women with Bleeding and/or
Spotting by Month for Women Treated with depo-subQ provera 104 in Endometriosis
Studies Combined
3. Cancer Risks
Long-term, case-controlled surveillance of users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate
IM 150 mg (Depo-Provera CI, 150 mg) found slight or no increased overall risk of
breast cancer and no overall increased risk of ovarian, liver, or cervical cancer,
and a prolonged, protective effect of reducing the risk of endometrial cancer.
A pooled analysisii from two case-control studies
iii iv reported the relative risk (RR) of breast cancer for women
who had ever used Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) as 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]
0.97 to 1.4). Overall, there was no increase in risk with increasing duration of
use of Depo-Provera CI (150 mg). The RR of breast cancer for women of all ages who
had initiated use of Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) within the previous 5 years was estimated
to be 2.0 (95% CI 1.5 to 2.8). A component of the pooled analysisiii
described above, showed an increased RR of 2.19 (95% CI 1.23 to 3.89) of
breast cancer associated with use of Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) in women whose first
exposure to drug was within the previous 4 years and who were under 35 years of
age. However, the overall RR for ever-users of Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) was only
1.21 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.52).
[NOTE: The value of 2.19 means that women whose first exposure to drug was within
the previous 4 years and who were under 35 years of age had a 2.19-fold (95% CI
1.23 to 3.89-fold) increased risk of breast cancer relative to nonusers. The National
Cancer Institutev reports an average annual incidence
rate for breast cancer for US women, all races, age 30 to 34 years of 26.7 per 100,000.
A RR of 2.19, thus, increases the possible risk from 26.7 to 58.5 cases per 100,000
women. The attributable risk, thus, is 31.8 per 100,000 women per year.]
The relative rate of invasive squamous-cell cervical cancer in women who ever used
Depo-Provera CI (150 mg) was estimated to be 1.11 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.29). No trends
in risk with duration of use or times since initial or most recent exposure were
observed.
4. Thromboembolic Disorders
Although MPA has not been causally associated with the induction of thrombotic or
thromboembolic disorders, there have been rare reports of serious thrombotic events
in women using Depo-Provera CI (150 mg). Any patient who develops thrombosis while
undergoing therapy with depo-subQ provera 104 should discontinue treatment unless
she has no other acceptable options for birth control (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
5. Ocular Disorders
Medication should not be re-administered pending examination if there is a sudden
partial or complete loss of vision or if there is a sudden onset of proptosis, diplopia
or migraine. If examination reveals papilledema or retinal vascular lesions, medication
should not be re-administered.
6. Ectopic Pregnancy
Healthcare providers should be alert to the possibility of an ectopic pregnancy
among women using depo-subQ provera 104™ who become pregnant
or complain of severe abdominal pain.
7. Anaphylaxis and Anaphylactoid Reaction
Serious anaphylactic reactions have been infrequently reported in women using Depo-Provera
CI (150 mg). If an anaphylactic reaction occurs, appropriate emergency medical treatment
should be instituted.
- Skegg DCG, Noonan EA, Paul C, Spears GFS, Meirik O, Thomas DB. Depot Medroxyprogesterone
Acetate and Breast Cancer: A Pooled Analysis from the World Health Organization
and New Zealand Studies. JAMA. 1995; 273(10): 799-804.
- WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives. Breast cancer and
depot- medroxyprogesterone acetate: a multi-national study. Lancet. 1991; 338:833-838.
- Paul C, Skegg DCG, Spears GFS. Depot medroxyprogesterone (Depo-Provera) and risk
of breast cancer. Br Med J. 1989; 299:759-762.
- Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results: Incidence and Mortality Data, 1973-1977.
National Cancer Institute Monograph, 57: June 1981. (NIH publication No. 81-2330).