Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
In the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT), the effect of LIPITOR
on fatal and non-fatal coronary heart disease was assessed
in 10,305 hypertensive patients
40–80 years of age (mean of 63 years), without a
previous myocardial infarction and with TC levels ≤251 mg/dL (6.5 mmol/L). Additionally,
all patients had at least 3 of the following cardiovascular risk factors: male gender
(81.1%), age >55 years (84.5%), smoking (33.2%), diabetes (24.3%), history of
CHD in a first-degree relative (26%), TC:HDL >6 (14.3%), peripheral vascular
disease (5.1%), left ventricular hypertrophy (14.4%), prior cerebrovascular event
(9.8%), specific ECG abnormality (14.3%), proteinuria/albuminuria (62.4%). In this
double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients were treated with anti-hypertensive
therapy (Goal BP <140/90 mm Hg for non-diabetic patients; <130/80 mm Hg for
diabetic patients) and allocated to either LIPITOR 10 mg daily (n=5168) or placebo
(n=5137), using a covariate adaptive method which took into account the distribution
of nine baseline characteristics of patients already enrolled and minimized the
imbalance of those characteristics across the groups. Patients were followed for
a median duration of 3.3 years.
The effect of 10 mg/day of LIPITOR on lipid levels was similar to that seen in previous
clinical trials.
LIPITOR significantly reduced the rate of coronary events [either fatal coronary
heart disease (46 events in the placebo group vs. 40 events in the LIPITOR group)
or non-fatal MI (108 events in the placebo group vs. 60 events in the LIPITOR group)]
with a relative risk reduction of 36% [(based on incidences of 1.9% for LIPITOR
vs. 3.0% for placebo), p=0.0005 (see Figure 1)]. The risk reduction was consistent
regardless of age, smoking status, obesity or presence of renal dysfunction. The
effect of LIPITOR was seen regardless of baseline LDL levels. Due to the small number
of events, results for women were inconclusive.
Figure 1: Effect of LIPITOR 10 mg/day on Cumulative Incidence of Non-Fatal Myocardial
Infarction or Coronary Heart Disease Death (in ASCOT-LLA)
LIPITOR also significantly decreased the relative risk for revascularization procedures
by 42%. Although the reduction of fatal and non-fatal strokes did not reach a pre-defined
significance level (p=0.01), a favorable trend was observed with a 26% relative
risk reduction (incidences of 1.7% for LIPITOR and 2.3% for placebo). There was
no significant difference between the treatment groups for death due to cardiovascular
causes (p=0.51) or noncardiovascular causes (p=0.17).
In the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS), the effect of LIPITOR
on cardiovascular disease (CVD) endpoints was assessed in
2838 subjects (94% white, 68% male), ages 40–75 with type 2 diabetes based on WHO
criteria, without prior history of cardiovascular disease and with LDL ≤ 160 mg/dL
and TG ≤600 mg/dL. In addition to diabetes, subjects had 1 or more of the following
risk factors: current smoking (23%), hypertension (80%), retinopathy (30%), or microalbuminuria
(9%) or macroalbuminuria (3%). No subjects on hemodialysis were enrolled in the
study. In this multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial, subjects
were randomly allocated to either LIPITOR 10 mg daily (1429) or placebo (1411) in
a 1:1 ratio and were followed for a median duration of 3.9 years. The primary endpoint
was the occurrence of any of the major cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction,
acute CHD death, unstable angina, coronary revascularization, or stroke. The primary
analysis was the time to first occurrence of the primary endpoint.
Baseline characteristics of subjects were: mean age of 62 years, mean HbA1c
7.7%; median LDL-C 120 mg/dL; median TC 207 mg/dL; median TG 151 mg/dL; median HDL-C
52mg/dL.
The effect of LIPITOR 10 mg/day on lipid levels was similar to that seen
in previous clinical trials.
LIPITOR significantly reduced the rate of major cardiovascular events (primary endpoint
events) (83 events in the LIPITOR group vs. 127 events in the placebo group) with
a relative risk reduction of 37%, HR 0.63, 95% CI (0.48, 0.83) (p=0.001) (see Figure
2). An effect of LIPITOR was seen regardless of age, sex, or baseline lipid levels.
LIPITOR significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 48% (21 events in the LIPITOR
group vs. 39 events in the placebo group), HR 0.52, 95% CI (0.31,0.89) (p=0.016)
and reduced the risk of MI by 42% (38 events in the LIPITOR group vs. 64 events in
the placebo group), HR 0.58, 95.1% CI (0.39, 0.86) (p=0.007). There was no significant
difference between the treatment groups for angina, revascularization procedures,
and acute CHD death.
There were 61 deaths in the LIPITOR group vs. 82 deaths in the placebo group (HR
0.73, p=0.059).
Figure 2: Effect of LIPITOR 10 mg/day on Time to Occurrence of Major Cardiovascular
Event (myocardial infarction, acute CHD death, unstable angina, coronary revascularization,
or stroke) in CARDS
In the Treating to New Targets Study (TNT), the effect of LIPITOR 80 mg/day vs.
LIPITOR 10 mg/day on the reduction in cardiovascular events was assessed in 10,001
subjects (94% white, 81% male, 38% ≥65 years) with clinically evident coronary heart
disease who had achieved a target LDL-C level <130 mg/dL after completing an
8-week, open-label, run-in period with LIPITOR 10 mg/day. Subjects were randomly
assigned to either 10 mg/day or 80 mg/day of LIPITOR and followed for a median duration
of 4.9 years. The primary endpoint was the time-to-first occurrence of any of the
following major cardiovascular events (MCVE): death due to CHD, non-fatal myocardial
infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and fatal and non-fatal stroke. The mean
LDL-C, TC, TG, non-HDL, and HDL cholesterol levels at 12 weeks were 73, 145, 128,
98, and 47 mg/dL during treatment with 80 mg of LIPITOR and 99, 177, 152, 129, and
48 mg/dL during treatment with 10 mg of LIPITOR.
Treatment with LIPITOR 80 mg/day significantly reduced the rate of MCVE (434 events
in the 80 mg/day group vs. 548 events in the 10 mg/day group) with a relative risk
reduction of 22%, HR 0.78, 95% CI (0.69, 0.89), p=0.0002 (see Figure 3 and Table
5). The overall risk reduction was consistent regardless of age (<65, ≥65) or
gender.
Figure 3: Effect of LIPITOR 80 mg/day vs. 10 mg/day on Time to Occurrence of Major
Cardiovascular Events (TNT)
TABLE 5. Overview of Efficacy Results in TNT
Of the events that comprised the primary efficacy endpoint, treatment with LIPITOR
80 mg/day significantly reduced the rate of non-fatal, non-procedure related MI and
fatal and non-fatal stroke, but not CHD death or resuscitated cardiac arrest (Table
5). Of the predefined secondary endpoints, treatment with LIPITOR 80 mg/day significantly
reduced the rate of coronary revascularization, angina, and hospitalization for heart
failure, but not peripheral vascular disease. The reduction in the rate of CHF with
hospitalization was only observed in the 8% of patients with a prior history of
CHF.
There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for all-cause mortality
(Table 5). The proportions of subjects who experienced cardiovascular death, including
the components of CHD death and fatal stroke, were numerically smaller in the LIPITOR
80 mg group than in the LIPITOR 10 mg treatment group. The proportions of subjects
who experienced noncardiovascular death were numerically larger in the LIPITOR 80
mg group than in the LIPITOR 10 mg treatment group.
In the Incremental Decrease in Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study
(IDEAL), treatment with LIPITOR 80 mg/day was compared to treatment with simvastatin
20–40 mg/day in 8,888 subjects up to 80 years of age with a history of CHD to assess
whether reduction in CV risk could be achieved. Patients were mainly male (81%),
white (99%) with an average age of 61.7 years, and an average LDL-C of 121.5 mg/dL
at randomization; 76% were on statin therapy. In this prospective, randomized, open-label,
blinded endpoint (PROBE) trial with no run-in period, subjects were followed for
a median duration of 4.8 years. The mean LDL-C, TC, TG, HDL, and non-HDL cholesterol
levels at Week 12 were 78, 145, 115, 45, and 100 mg/dL during treatment with 80 mg
of LIPITOR and 105, 179, 142, 47, and 132 mg/dL during treatment with 20–40 mg of
simvastatin.
There was no significant difference between the treatment groups for the primary
endpoint, the rate of first major coronary event (fatal CHD, non-fatal MI, and resuscitated
cardiac arrest): 411 (9.3%) in the LIPITOR 80 mg/day group vs. 463 (10.4%) in the
simvastatin 20–40 mg/day group, HR 0.89, 95% CI ( 0.78, 1.01), p=0.07.
There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for all-cause
mortality: 366 (8.2%) in the LIPITOR 80 mg/day group vs. 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin
20–40 mg/day group. The proportions of subjects who experienced CV or non-CV death
were similar for the LIPITOR 80 mg group and the simvastatin 20–40 mg group.
Hyperlipidemia (Heterozygous Familial and Nonfamilial) and Mixed Dyslipidemia
(Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb)
LIPITOR reduces total-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, apo B, and TG, and increases HDL-C in patients
with hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia. Therapeutic response is seen within
2 weeks, and maximum response is usually achieved within 4 weeks and maintained
during chronic therapy.
LIPITOR is effective in a wide variety of patient populations with hyperlipidemia,
with and without hypertriglyceridemia, in men and women, and in the elderly.
In two multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-response studies in patients with hyperlipidemia,
LIPITOR given as a single dose over 6 weeks, significantly reduced total-C, LDL-C,
apo B, and TG. (Pooled results are provided in Table 6.)
TABLE 6. Dose-Response in Patients With Primary Hyperlipidemia (Adjusted Mean
% Change From Baseline)a
In patients with Fredrickson Types IIa and IIb hyperlipoproteinemia pooled
from 24 controlled trials, the median (25th and 75th percentile) percent changes
from baseline in HDL-C for LIPITOR 10, 20, 40, and 80 mg were 6.4 (-1.4, 14),
8.7 (0, 17), 7.8 (0, 16), and 5.1 (-2.7, 15), respectively. Additionally, analysis
of the pooled data demonstrated consistent and significant decreases in total-C,
LDL-C, TG, total-C/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C.
In three multicenter, double-blind studies in patients with hyperlipidemia,
LIPITOR was compared to other statins. After randomization,
patients were treated for 16 weeks with either LIPITOR 10 mg per day or a fixed
dose of the comparative agent (Table 7).
TABLE 7. Mean Percentage Change From Baseline at Endpoint
(Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Trials)
The impact on clinical outcomes of the differences in lipid-altering effects between
treatments shown in Table 7 is not known. Table 7 does not contain data comparing
the effects of LIPITOR 10 mg and higher doses of lovastatin, pravastatin, and
simvastatin. The drugs compared in the studies summarized in the table are not necessarily
interchangeable.
Hypertriglyceridemia (Fredrickson Type IV)
The response to LIPITOR in 64 patients with isolated hypertriglyceridemia treated
across several clinical trials is shown in the table below (Table 8). For the LIPITOR-treated
patients, median (min, max) baseline TG level was 565 (267-1502).
TABLE 8. Combined Patients With Isolated Elevated TG:
Median (min, max) Percent Changes From Baseline
Dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III)
The results of an open-label crossover study of 16 patients (genotypes: 14 apo E2/E2
and 2 apo E3/E2) with dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III) are shown
in the table below (Table 9).
TABLE 9. Open-Label Crossover Study of 16 Patients
With Dysbetalipoproteinemia (Fredrickson Type III)
Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
In a study without a concurrent control group, 29 patients ages 6 to 37 years with
homozygous FH received maximum daily doses of 20 to 80 mg of LIPITOR. The mean LDL-C
reduction in this study was 18%. Twenty-five patients with a reduction in LDL-C
had a mean response of 20% (range of 7% to 53%, median of 24%); the remaining 4
patients had 7% to 24% increases in LDL-C. Five of the 29 patients had absent LDL-receptor
function. Of these, 2 patients also had a portacaval shunt and had no significant
reduction in LDL-C. The remaining 3 receptor-negative patients had a mean LDL-C
reduction of 22%.
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Pediatric Patients
In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label phase,
187 boys and postmenarchal girls 10-17 years of age (mean age 14.1 years) with heterozygous
familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or severe hypercholesterolemia, were randomized
to LIPITOR (n=140) or placebo (n=47) for 26 weeks and then all received LIPITOR
for 26 weeks. Inclusion in the study required 1) a baseline LDL-C level ≥ 190 mg/dL
or 2) a baseline LDL-C level ≥ 160 mg/dL and positive family history of FH or documented
premature cardiovascular disease in a first- or second-degree relative. The mean
baseline LDL-C value was 218.6 mg/dL (range: 138.5-385.0 mg/dL) in the LIPITOR group
compared to 230.0 mg/dL (range: 160.0-324.5 mg/dL) in the placebo group. The dosage
of LIPITOR (once daily) was 10 mg for the first
4 weeks and uptitrated to 20 mg if the LDL-C level was > 130 mg/dL. The number
of LIPITOR-treated patients who required uptitration to 20 mg after Week 4 during
the double-blind phase was 80 (57.1%).
LIPITOR significantly decreased plasma levels of total-C, LDL-C, triglycerides,
and apolipoprotein B during the 26-week double-blind phase (see Table 10).
TABLE 10. Lipid-altering Effects of LIPITOR in Adolescent Boys and Girls with Heterozygous
Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Severe Hypercholesterolemia (Mean Percentage Change
From Baseline at Endpoint in Intention-to-Treat Population)
The mean achieved LDL-C value was 130.7 mg/dL (range: 70.0-242.0 mg/dL) in the LIPITOR
group compared to 228.5 mg/dL (range: 152.0-385.0 mg/dL) in the placebo group during
the 26-week double-blind phase.
The safety and efficacy of doses above 20 mg have not been studied in controlled
trials in children. The long-term efficacy of LIPITOR therapy in childhood to reduce
morbidity and mortality in adulthood has not been established.
References
1National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP): Highlights of the Report of the Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in
Children and Adolescents,
Pediatrics. 89(3):495-501. 1992.